A comparison of natalie zemon davis and robert finlays account on the life of martin guerre

Having begun with such hypotheses, however, Davis is faced with the challenge of answering two resulting questions. Natalie Zemon Davis reconstructs the lives of ordinary people, in a sparkling way that reveals the hidden attachments and sensibilities of nonliterate sixteenth-century villagers.

The Return of Martin Guerre

I agree with Finlay that she let her imagination run away with her and even with a credible list of sources there is no call for stretching the truth and then calling it history. It would seem that Bertrande was a simple housewife, whose main concern in life was trying to keep body and soul together, who, tragically, was abandoned by her husband and tricked into living with an impostor for four years.

I am taking up my post, alongside many wiser souls, as a low ranking messenger boy in the fight to establish a third path. The astonishing case captured the imagination of the continent.

Humiliated and trapped by the constraints of patriarchal peasant society, Bertrande waited here, neither wife nor widow, for her husband to return for approximately eight years.

Lewis draws an affecting portrait of a Bertrande torn between love and duty, a heroine at once shrewd, passionate, and honorable 55, 57, Coincidentally, that is actually exactly what I am trying to prove in my term paper for this class.

Davis bases her narrative on the two standard sources: The case was so striking and extraordinary that Coras, the investigating judge, and La Sueur, a lawyer from the region both had books out in press about the case within a year. Du Tilh, for his part, eventually confesses his crimes, but in testament to his love for Bertrande never implicates his accomplice, and she escapes punishment while he is put to death.

Neither Martin Guerre nor Beatrice nor Arnund actually left any written records. To the heart of Finlays article is the assertion that the wife of Martin Guerre was not in on some plot, but duped by a scoundrel.

Few records of the sixteenth century court case exist, so Davis relies mainly on two historical documents for the facts: This is a flimsy foundation on which to build an interpretation of the Martin Guerre story that contradicts the surviving evidence. In many respects Killer Angels is superior to Martin Guerre; it is demonstrably evident that Killer Angels is on far firmer grounds, factually, than Martin Guerre.

Again, self-fashioning crowns the pyramid of assumptions: The awards citation described her as "one of the most creative historians writing today" who inspired younger generations of historians and promoted "cross-fertilization between disciplines".

For his part, Arnaud remained faithful to his lover and accomplice, asserting that she had been duped as thoroughly as her fellow villagers of Artigat. In her view, those annotations "gave him a chance to argue that Bertrande was coerced and that the death penalty was warranted.

The judges were concerned for the interests of the Guerre family in dealing with the property and child; torture was not always used by the Toulouse court; and the apology was canceled when it seemed clear that Arnaud had no intention of apologizing, not as Davis hints because of fear that he would name Bertrande as his accomplice.

She criticizes Finlay for not taking the time to read her work thoroughly and analyzing the primary sources she used. At the trial at Toulouse, the real Martin Guerre returns with his wooden leg, proving that Arnaud was guilty, sentencing him to death.

To blur this line is a disservice to the field in that it renders the study of history as mere partisan propaganda. Supposedly troubled by psychological identification with Arnaud, Coras unconsciously allowed an element of ambiguity and tension into his commentary on the case, a "multivalent representation" that exposes his uncertainties.

In Trickster Travelsshe describes how the early 16th-century North African Muslim " Leo Africanus " Hasan al-Wazzan managed to live as a Christian in Italy after he was kidnapped by Christian pirates and also sees his writings as an example of "the possibility of communication and curiosity in a world divided by violence.

She would go along with the court case and hope to lose it. While even the most rigorous historian inevitably colors the facts with his own speculations, Ranke is a prime example of this history is supposed to about the interpretation of past events through the lens of documentary evidence.

Nevertheless, no one would ever consider Killer Angels to be a history of the battle. There is, of course, no indication that Coras conceived of "a play of tragedy" between Bertrande and Arnaud.

The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller, trans. Coras was also only one of four who reported on the judicial case of Martin Guerre in We live in a world caught between secularism and religious fundamentalism.

Arnaud was hanged, Martin Guerre resumed his proper place and Bertrande was absolved of having committed adultery, as the impression of the court was that she had been tricked into believing that Arnaud was her husband and was not a party to his fraud.

If historical records can be bypassed so thoroughly in the service of an inventive blend of intuition and assertion, it is difficult to see what distinguishes the writing of history from that of fiction. If "Bertrande does not seem a woman so easily fooled" in bed by a rogue like Arnaud, it is to be expected that her subsequent deceits would elude documentation.

Does Davis even bother to bring down a case, from that time period, in which a woman played such a game and thus allow us to draw some sort of comparison? The self-fashioning rustics and the conflicted scholar are nowhere to be found in the ArrestMemorable, a document that Davis implies is not to be trusted, in all its multivalent complexity, precisely because it fails to yield up the characters called for by her reinterpretation.

But there is no evidence of "respect" shown by the court toward Arnaud. This Bertrande de Rols seems to be far more a product of invention than of historical reconstruction.

The Martin Guerre Debate- Natalie Zemon Davis and Robert Finlay

SuperSummary, a modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, offers high-quality study guides for challenging works of literature. Impelled by guilt and anger, she finally takes Arnaud to court, although even then she briefly hopes that the judges will declare him her husband Depth, humanity, and color in historical reconstruction are the products of imagination and do not flow from a vulgar reasoning upon data.About Martin Guerre, I would say, without hesitation, the movie was great, but Natalie Davis’s book is even greater.

” —Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie, The New York Review of Books “ Davis combines a veteran researcher’s expertise with a lay reader’s curiosity and an easygoing style. Natalie Zemon Davis, The Return of Martin Guerre (Cambridge: Harvard, ), viii.

3. Jean-Claude Carriere, Le Retour de Martin Guerre, directed by Daniel Vigne (; France). Natalie Zemon Davis, in her book The Return of Martin Guerre, approaches the story from a fresh perspective, hoping to link the impostor’s ruse with the creation of personal identity, and in doing so, shorten the gap between sixteenth century French peasants and the upper class.

The Martin Guerre Debate- Natalie Zemon Davis and Robert Finlay The book titled The Return of Martin Guerre was written by historian Natalie Zemon Davis. Davis also has a lot of other works on women’s history which could have affected her bias in this book.

Diefendorf, Barbara and Hesse, Carla (editors) Culture and Identity in Early Modern France (–): Essays in Honor of Natalie Zemon Davis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, Finlay, R. "The Refashioning of Martin Guerre" pages – from American Historical Review Volume 93.

Finlay and Davis, opposing arguements on Martin Guerre The short book The Return of Martin Guerre by Natalie Zemon Davis is a historiography-like book about a real court case that took place in France in the sixteenth century.

A comparison of natalie zemon davis and robert finlays account on the life of martin guerre
Rated 5/5 based on 57 review