However, the question that ought to be asked is what the ethical status of human reproductive cloning should be if the technology were accepted to be as safe, for example, as IVF technology.
If you truly believe and trust this in your heart, receiving Jesus alone as your Saviordeclaring, " Jesus is Lord ," you will be saved from judgment and spend eternity with God in heaven. In general, notions that the cloning of individuals, possibly at the same rate as for IVF, would decrease genetic diversity in a global population of six billion people, is an exaggerated and spurious claim.
Cloned children would unavoidably be raised "in the shadow" of their nuclear donor, in a way that would strongly tend to constrain individual psychological and social development.
Identical twins should be prohibited if this dignity argument has any merit, but there have been no moves in modern times to prohibit twins. Human society can accept or reject any proposed technology on its own merits. Cloning is a reproductive right, and should be allowed once it is judged to be no less safe than natural reproduction.
Those who favor cloning humans argue that we could produce more geniuses An argument in support of human cloning thereby improve life for everyone through their contributions.
There is no proof that someone who is genetically identical to Albert Einstein, for example, would be a genius or would use his genius for socially acceptable ends. Another scientific argument is that genetic diversity helps provide the "pool" of variations available for a robust human population.
But cloning technologies are needed if inheritable genetic modification is to become commercially practicable. Also, in Genesis 11 is the story of the Tower of Babel.
Learn more about Cloning Ethics. The number of men and women who do not produce eggs or sperm at all is very small, and has been greatly reduced by modern assisted-reproduction techniques.
Reproductive cloning would allow lesbians to have a child without having to use donor sperm, and gay men to have a child that does not have genes derived from an egg donor though, of course, a surrogate would have to carry the pregnancy. Everybody who intentionally conceives a child does so for a reason, whether it is to raise a child to love and nurture, propagate their genes, support themselves in their old age, bear a child on a significant date for example 1 Januaryconform to peer or parental pressure, or mistakenly help save a marriage.
However, genetic determinism is false, many factors combine to determine who a person is. Every medical technology carries with it a degree of risk. It would be extremely unlikely that a clone of Beethoven could compose a tenthsymphony.
If any technology is unsafe, it should not be permitted until the safety risks are managed. And clones should not be discriminated against Principle 2. What are some arguments against cloning? It really is not difficult to understand how a clone fits into a family.
Without delving into the mathematics of population diversity, if a couple were to clone a child, who would not otherwise have existed, and that child when mature reproduces sexually, there would be an increase in genetic diversity—another person with a unique genome would have been created.
Cloning techniques will eventually be perfected in mammals and will then be suitable for human trials. Identical twins are natural clones. For reproductive cloning, this could mean being as safe as IVF technology for example.
Expectations would be high, but misguided. They had these embryos tested, and genomes checked. An adopted person, or one produced through IVF technology if produced using donor sperm or eggsor through a surrogacy agreement, is also not a biological descendent of its parents.
Just as each member of a pair of identical twins has a soul, so would a clone. The identity argument is not an argument against cloning; rather it is an argument against placing unnecessary and unwarranted pressure on an individual, regardless of how they were conceived.
As for spare parts, it would be no more ethical to use a clone for that purpose than it would be to use your next door neighbor. That there may not be any medical reasons for reproductive cloning is in essence irrelevant. For example, it took hundreds of attempts to clone Dolly the sheep.
An example is hip displasia in purebred dogs. The arguments against human cloning, such as those presented in the Andrews Report, are weak, except for the safety issue.
The problem of "expectations" is hardly unique to cloned children. There are plenty of arguments against cloning - especially against cloning humans - ranging from scientific issues, to the practicality of cloning, to religious objections.
The arguments can either be applied with equal force to other ethical situations that are not prohibited, or are inconsistent with the three principles listed above. Arguments in Favor of Reproductive Cloning 1.
There is no inconsistency between supporting the former and opposing the latter.the arguments in support of permitting human cloning, although with no implication that it is the stronger or weaker position.
Moral Arguments in Support of Human Cloning. Reasons For and Against Human Cloning Recently, the controversy around human cloning has received a lot of news coverage; yet unsurprisingly, a clear and thorough examination of both sides has been lacking from the news media.
Basically, human cloning is. Reproductive Cloning Arguments Pro and Con Cloning is a form of asexual reproduction. A child produced by cloning would be the genetic duplicate of an existing person. This is an attempt to explore the pros and cons of human cloning and to provide enough information of both sides of the arguments in order for the reader to make their own informed decision on whether human cloning is ethical or not.
In Support of the Argument for Human Cloning by John Greeney The announcement of the birth of the cloned ewe, Dolly, in by scientists at the Roslin Institute, was a shock for the entire world.
Up until that point, the issue of the morality and ethics of cloning had been relegated to discussions of purely theoretical nature.
The identity argument is not an argument against cloning; rather it is an argument against placing unnecessary and unwarranted pressure on an individual, regardless of how they were conceived.
Cloning is a threat to human diversity.Download